Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swan Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Swan Man

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a textbook case of WP:BIO1E. Zero in-depth coverage about this person outside of the friendship with the swan. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't even know if this is a "one event" kind of thing, or just the feel-good story a few places picked up for their daily animal story that makes you smile. The guy isn't notable and also no source refers to him as "Swan Man." If this in unaccountably kept it should be moved to Recep Mirzan or to 1984 Turkish swan rescue because it's not about the man, it's about the rescue of the swan. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A human interest story, but nothing notable about it. I think they just made up a nickname for him for the interview. Oaktree b (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The present amount of sources is not enough to pass WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 16:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not the place to turn slow news day human interest stories into something with permanent notice.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But its a swan! That hangs out with a man! Won't people in 100 years want to read about that? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.