Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surongo 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. As pointed out by the "delete" !votes, unsourced content can not be merged elsewhere. ✗plicit 00:08, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Surongo 2

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The article says that "No formal announcement regarding scripting, casting, or green-lighting has been made" and the film is not even in pre-production. Astaire (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. Astaire (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Raihan Rafi Cinematic Universe Ahammed Saad (talk) 06:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Surongo - As no independent source mentioning the film. - Rht bd (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative proposal: merge with Surongo if the previously mentioned article gets deleted per consensus. Ahammed Saad (talk) 20:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Original research and crap article really. Not encyclopedic.Crampcomes (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting since the suggested Merge target has been deleted
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The topic is unsourced speculation. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:19, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as it fails to show WP:NFILM, WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. It is also unreferenced and a personal assumption or speculation. Fade258 (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.