Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunder Deep Group of Institutions (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sunder Deep Group of Institutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails to meet notability and WP:NCORP Advait (talk) 06:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. plicit 23:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Advait (talk) 06:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Advait (talk) 06:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, No adequate sourcing for the article to be notable enough. As per above, fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Wakowako (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Redirecting to Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University seems like an option too; the only bits worth salvaging appear to be the name. It certainly exists, it might be having low enrollment or money troubles. In any case, there's no depth of coverage. tedder (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I originally closed this discussion at delete, but the nominator and one of the supporting delete arguments turned out to be sockpuppets. I have undone the closure and relisted this for additional comments.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.