Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Pearson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sue Pearson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG: I found no coverage in reliable secondary sources. The author moved it to mainspace after an AfC draft was rejected due to lack of notability. Rentier (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 22:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move back to Draft. Does not meet WP:JOURNALIST. A single appearance on a game show where the article focused more on her opponent doesn't constitute significant coverage. Magazines she edits in aren't significant bodies of work. The programme in which she presents isn't Wikipedia notable. Note, you should just boldly move it back to Draft next time. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly fails notability, is ORPHAN, likely a vanity page, etc. Agricola44 (talk) 16:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Moving back to Draft does not solve notability issue. Per AngusWOOF, article subject only is known for one event so naturally fails WP:BLP1E (actually, fails all three criteria there), and I doubt she was substantially notable enough in the show's history to warrant any coverage. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no significant coverage. Tacyarg (talk) 04:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.