User talk:Isciencewriter

This is Isciencewriter's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sue Pearson (UK Science Communicator) (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jtmorgan was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I don't think that this article does a good enough job establishing the notability of the subject. As a rule of thumb, articles about people only pass the notability threshold if the author can show multiple independent sources that focus on the subject. Articles written by the subject are not in themselves enough to demonstrate notability—many people write articles. The DailyMail profile you provide is a good start, but in a quick search of Google I was unable to find any additional sources (for example, news articles, books, awards, etc.) that show that this subject is more notable than other people, most of whom don't have a Wikipedia article written about them! If you can find more sources like that, please add them and re-submit this article for review. And if you have questions, be sure to ask at the Teahouse!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sue Pearson (UK Science Communicator) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

J-Mo 23:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Isciencewriter, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! J-Mo 23:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sue Pearson

Hello, Isciencewriter. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sue Pearson, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sue Pearson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sue Pearson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Pearson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Isciencewriter. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sue Pearson, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]