Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, default to delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 21:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soundman

Non-notable musician who improbably claims to have invented Ragga, Hip Hop, Dub Step and Hardcore plus some audio software and a computer language, all totally unreferenced of course. Only 17 Google hits - no of them from reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSIC. Astronaut (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of notability provided, and someone with that kind of reputation would certainly turn up more than 17 hits. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Loads of unsourced BS. Hairhorn (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clean or Stub. While Antonio Straughn has a impressive discography with tracks on both indy labels and music giants such as Polygram, Columbia and Telstar (thus meeting the requirements for notability), and indeed seems to be a pioneer of jungle and drum'n'bass -music since 1991, this article is trash, with unrealistic claims. May be a form of WP:Attack. You can find (some) his discography here [[1]]. Not sure what to do with it, as documenting the events of underground dance music on Wikipedia is a road fraught with perils - very poorly documented, online or otherwise. Casimirpo (talk) 23:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cleaned it. Good luck digging up references to this guy, although I am sure there are dozens, his artist name makes it difficult. Maybe this deletion could be re-considered now that trash has been cleaned up. Who knows, I might even add to the article tomorrow. Casimirpo (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: For this to be kept, it needs reliable sources. Otherwise, it's a BLP violation. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 06:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.