Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soramimi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice towards a merge. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:18, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Soramimi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of reliable sources showing notability. Lizzie Harrison 00:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This article has been open since 2006. Does it need to be redone or rewritten? Yes. Are the examples a bit of overkill? Maybe. The topic is notable because I found it mentioned in the Netherlands, Russia, USA and other locations with Karaoke. And even a Soramimi Tool compatible for Ipods and Windows 7 applications. On the following blog, not really usable as a source by itself, I found ... soramimi in "Exploring Fact City," a March 29 New York Times Week in Review article about Wikipedia: ... While living in Europe in the 1960s, I often misheard foreign words in songs and sang (tried to sing!) the words wrong in my language. I was told what I was doing was a parody with the music. Wikipedia has Parody music. This topic goes one more step with a term that has gone international. A definite keeper, but needing work! Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't care how long this article's been around. Doesn't matter. What does is the lack of independent, verifiable sources. Blogs don't cut it. This isn't notable, and doesn't meet WP:GNG. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep/Merge. Needs to be tidied up. Perhaps putting it for Peer review might help? If that doesn't help then merging it into the Homophonic translation article and making a section dedicated to it might help.Bleubeatle (talk) 07:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This was listed and relisted in 2008, and kept. Important for the inter- and multi-cultural aspects, linguistic studies etc. More quotidian and amusing than Pokémon Diamond and Pearl. Pangram has one reference.Red Hurley (talk) 07:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ITSUSEFUL, WP:ITSFUNNY, WP:OTHERSTUFF. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.