Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SolarMobil Manipal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 17:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SolarMobil Manipal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The organisation SolarMobil has undergone changes and the page shows wrong content. It also puts content as an advertisement. Rashmi Sreekumar (talk) 07:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is actually a reason to edit the page and fix it not a reason to delete the current page and start over as the OP stated in the last prod they added to the article, "The creator wishes to take the page down. His account is blocked and he is unable to do so. The reason for taking the page down is because the major changes need to be made so a new page will be made instead." -- GB fan 10:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Nominator does not list any WP:DEL-REASON and the incorrect information- as well as the advertisement-like content needs to be corrected instead of an article deleted. DeVerm (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per DeVerm. Class455fan1 (talk) 23:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.