Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skos Shuttle (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Skos Shuttle (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like an advertisement for a non-notable software. I can't find any sourcing that demonstrates GNG. — InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 23:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article created and maintained by two WP:SPA accounts, linking to the primary site. The best coverage found in my searches is a page in a review of several classification tools here with an opinion that "Skos Shuttle seems to be a very promising tool". However I don't see that as sufficient to demonstrate attained encyclopaedic notability, by WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This software is 1. notable and 2. accessible/present de-facto online, 3. generous and free for universities and students. Why deleting even a modest article on it a priori? You prefere to support notable commercial software which is sold for much money ? Please take back your request for deletion. It is a mistake or a lobby driven wish. And please do this change sustainably. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.36.170.127 (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The keep argument above amounts to nothing more than "it exists" DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm unable to find sufficient evidence that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. gongshow talk 08:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.