Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skooli.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have discounted the "Keep" argument from Brett nineone, a user with only four edits, two of them Skooli spam and the other two to this discussion. Bishonen | talk 22:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skooli.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial references- no notability DGG ( talk ) 02:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this actually suggests any better notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Might be notable enough in future, but not now. Plus the article is just too promotional. Edwardx (talk) 14:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this page - All sources are legitimate Canadian news outlets. All information on this page is verified/verifiable by reference checks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett nineone (talk • contribs) 20:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.