Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sierra Chart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced stub on a non-notable program for traders that fails WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. There are some hits in niche finance blogs of dubious reliability (e.g., [1]), but I'm not finding significant coverage in reliable sources. Deleted three times already (albeit a long time ago), so I might suggest adding a pinch of salt if consensus is to delete. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion:? While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2007-11 ✗ PROD, 2007-11 ✗ A1, 2007-11 ✗ CSD G11

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 15:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence that it is notable (t · c) buidhe 10:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Zing^(Talk!) 05:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.