Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sican language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sican language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't verify that this exists. I suspect there may be an error in BBC magazine. If it really did last until the 20th century, we should be able to verify that with standard linguistic references. There seems to be nothing, at least not under this name. — kwami (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this just doesn't wash. Sources say the Sican culture died out in 1375 CE, and I can't find any references to its language except mirrors to the Wikipedia stub. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 22:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unverifiable. Angr (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Found no sources at Google Books or Google Scholar. Fails verifiability. Edison (talk) 21:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.