Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shravan Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shravan Kumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The article also reeks of original research as the references being used don't support most of the personal information. Some of the references don't even mention him. Those that do only mention him briefly or quote him. Taking part in a protest, hacking into a university website and absconding from an ongoing investigation.. Unable to see how any of these is encyclopedic or makes him notable. M4DU7 (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is cleverly disguised. The hacking thing, [1], source doesn't mention him so he is taking credit for it for no reason. Same goes for the protect. The scandal does mention him but even if we would consider that notable, it is WP:1E at best. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article need not to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:61AD:9998:3814:D0E7:E0CB:AB15 (talk) 12:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about him. Search results return the death of a director who kinda had the same name as him. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.