Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shilpa Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor 00:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shilpa Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Singh has never won any major beauty pageant. She lost the Miss India competion, but was made winner when her predecessor was disqualified. She then lost at Miss Universe. We lack enough coverage of her for the article to pass the general notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. She did win, even if it was because of someone else's disqualification. Nearly all of the Miss Universe 2012 contestants have articles. I don't see why she should be excluded, seeing as she represented a large country and ranked in the top 16 in the competition. She gets a bit of newspaper coverage.[1][2] Clarityfiend (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I personally think that Miss Universe and Miss World contestants are notable considering that these 2 are the world biggest pageants. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. She won by disqualification only, and as mentioned very little coverage. Iazyges (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to I AM She – Miss Universe India as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I added 3 sources to the article. Let me know if more is required. Sources are available in abundance. Pratyush Sinha Pratyush 03:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference - Adding some references here - Deccan Herald, The New Indian Express, CNN-News18, India Today, Deccan Chronicle, Popsugar.com, Firstpost, DNA, Zee News. Pratyush 07:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PratyushSinha101 (talk • contribs)

Keep: Pratyush's sourcing gives this a HEY. p b p 13:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kudos to Pratyush. Sources meet WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.