Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiho Yano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Yoshihiro Akiyama#Personal life. I accept this as an ATD although I dislike how many times a woman's biography is turned into a redirect to her spouse's article. Seems to mainly happen with historical figures. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shiho Yano

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability, married to a celebrity and done some modeling. That's it. Nswix (talk) 04:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't dig for sources, but considering the actual contents a redirect to Yoshihiro_Akiyama#Personal_life would not be inappropriate IMO. Cavarrone 00:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Cavarrone. Redirecting to her husband's page seems to be the best option. If this were a new article, that is probably what I would do. As this article is now, it is close to falling into the criteria for A7. Bensci54 (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Yoshihiro Akiyama for now. In trying to come up with reliable sources, I found a Korea Times piece, but I think a BIG issue is that many of the articles that mention her are NOT in English.Historyday01 (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.