Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahidul Alam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I am early closing this under our snowball clause justified by Ignore all rules and saving everybody's time as Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 19:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shahidul Alam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to the WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE guidelines the article can not be promoted. No WP:RS. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 13:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 13:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 13:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No reliable sources, we're told above. The man's a juror for Prix Pictet, which has a page about him. Read it. -- Hoary (talk) 14:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Numerous RS can be found about him. Time, Indian Express, The Hindu - Mar11 (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Passes WP:BASIC. E.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], etc. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly passed WP:GNG per references in article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.