Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SetSchedule.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:52, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SetSchedule.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 03:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 14:18, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per norminator, subject has a few passing mentions and no WP:SIGCOV. It's probably a promo piece for the company. PlotHelpful (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sources are way too weak to pass WP:NCORP, too many forbes contributors Prague post contributors, interviews and passing mentions. The article creator looks very much like an undeclared paid editor. --Dom from Paris (talk) 18:41, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.