Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Igorevich Yakovlev
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Spartaz Humbug! 19:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sergey Igorevich Yakovlev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The subject of this article appears to lack sufficient notability for inclusion: the subject does not seem to have received non-trivial coverage in independent, reliable sources. No such sources are given in the article and an online search for sources (including a standard web search and Google News and Books searches) does not yield a single useful non-mirror hit. The article has been tagged for notability and lack of sources since June 2007, and the only reason I did not PROD it is that a Russian-language version of the article exists (link). While that does not prove notability by itself, the Russian-language article contains quite a bit of content (but, unfortunately, no real sources) which could possibly give an indication of the subject's notability. –Black Falcon (Talk) 20:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This was both not listed by the nom and missed by DumbBot. It has been listed. Wizardman 22:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable Novosibirsk musician.DonaldDuck (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability requires objective evidence. Can you offer proof of notability, i.e. that the subject of the article has received substantial coverage in reliable sources? –Black Falcon (Talk) 13:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.