Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sematary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sematary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, all are either primary or simply not reliable according to WP:RSP. The article uses Discogs, Reddit, SoundCloud, X, Instagram, and Genius (see WP:RSDISCOGS, WP:RSREDDIT, WP:GENIUS) as main sources. Two interviews that were published by other, non-verifiable sources are also included, and for the hell of it I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. This makes Sematary ineligible for a Wikipedia article according to WP:MUSICBIO. He is not the subject of any, let alone multiple non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are notable. He hasn't charted, he hasn't been certified gold or higher, as much as I love the guy there's nothing notable about him in Wikipedia standards. Locust member (talk) 13:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.