Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Hilley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Hilley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, can't find any significant coverage for this voice actor bar listings etc. PROD removed. Black Kite 21:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand and source, as searches reveal what the nominator missed. Apparently this actor/voice artist is known for works outside of Squidbillies and Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite your claim, I did that search myself, and I still don't see any significant coverage there. Yes, he's had a few voice parts, but I'd expect to see more than there is if he is actually notable. (Those few news reports are all from local press, as well).Black Kite 22:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The sources linked by MichaelQSchmidt do not, in my view, amount to significant coverage as required by WP:GNG. There just isn't enough here to support a properly verified reliable article. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No offense intended to the article's subject, but keeping this article would appear to interpret the notability guidelines for actors far too broadly. Chicken Wing (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.