Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schnitzel Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Between discogs (which is user generated and not reliable) and the records website - appears to fail GNG at this time. SarahStierch (talk) 07:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Schnitzel Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 16:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 16:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I search for info on "Schnitzel Records", I find "Professor Schnitzel records" (records by the 1960s Pennsylvania German comic Herman F. Schnitzel). The Schnitzel Records Ltd topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the Schnitzel Record. Does not meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:CORP, was about to nominate it myself. ukexpat (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No Deletion - I added a second source. There is no need for deletion. If you think the page does not meet the criteria, please give some advice how to improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Sbr (talk • contribs) 14:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your link to a WP:MIRROR site (which would have been an obvious fact if one actually reads one's refs). DMacks (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I added a discography from a reliable source. I'd like more sources, but a company releasing material by a number of notable bands says notability to me. Black Kite (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ukexpat: no independent sources with substantial reporting about the company. There's no doubt has released albums for various groups, but unless there are stories about the company, all we have is essentially a summary-style list notable products whose notability does not appear to derive from the company's general notability as a whole. DMacks (talk) 16:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.