Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarab Studio
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as failing WP:CORP (and therefore WP:N). ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Scarab Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable corp. References given do not support notability. Fails WP:CORP. Drawn Some (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete After reviewing the "references", I doubt any of them meet WP standards. One is a site hosted/maintained by a single person on a .edu domain, one is a description of work created by the company (in the company's own words), and the other, while possibly about a piece of work the company created, does not even mention the company... Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not speedy, as it doesn't meet any of the criteria. However, it does appear to be non-notable, with no significant independent coverage that I could find. Note that there was an identically titled studio in London in the first half of the 20th century, however it appears to be unrelated to this one. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 16:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.