Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScaleMP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ScaleMP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, does not have significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Rusf10 (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is one where I have concerns over the notability of the organisation however the product at first glance looks a little different, but the article doesn't demonstrate that. A very quick glance indicates a rescue might be possible but depends on independent reviews which might be scare. However at a quick glance isbn 9781614990406 but be good for a start, and there's good load of Google Scholar hits too some of which not likely be independent...Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I would have improved the article apart from the early relist and not letting run for 168 hours. But the early relist has wound me up like it did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing resource management. Perhaps someone else will do a rescue. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.