Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhosh Pandit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Santhosh Pandit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable references to prove notability of the subject. Re-creation of previously deleted article. -- Tinu Cherian - 08:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable enough (although his videos are a huge hit in youtube for all wrong reasons) --Sreejith K (talk) 08:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom--Sodabottle (talk) 09:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This guy is a nobody looking for a ego boost. The page is likely to have a negative effect for wikipedia as possible source of abusive comments — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nithinharidas (talk • contribs) 10:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- — Nithinharidas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The only abusive comment here is yours. WP:NPA? Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)please delete delete[reply]

Delete - Not enough notable. Not enough references in the articles --Anoopan (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-This article is immaterial as it is about someone who is of no great concern to any one out there. As aforementioned by other users this article is about someone looking for a ego boost and the page is likely to have a negative impact for the Wikipedia community. --User talk:Bluestreak007 —Preceding undated comment added 11:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- — Bluestreak007 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This article is about someone who is looking for a ego boost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kptikku (talk • contribs) 12:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User:Kptikku is most like a sock of User:Nithinharidas. Both these accounts have edited only here. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 14:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 14:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. No credible claim for notability. Salih (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete: He is not an actor, a stupid fellow doing all these for cheap publicty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.16.242 (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't conform to WP:N Arjun^codename024 21:33, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He is basically using wikipedia for his film publicity. NO more further nominations should be allowed
- There is a clear consensus for Deletion of the article and can be easily closed per WP:SNOW. But as a general rule, I won't delete page of which I have nominated the AFD and participated in . I will let some other admin close it. -- Tinu Cherian - 01:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Per nom. A eunanemous vote, eh? Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 15:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.