Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saintgits College of Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saintgits College of Engineering

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any decent coverage outside of primary sources and routine database listings for this college; does not apparently meet WP:NORG or WP:GNG. The article was possibly created for promotional purposes. JaiMahadev (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator is blocked/banned. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 12:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we need independent sources. Wikipedia is not supposed to be built on original reearch, and that is what we have if we directly republish from an organization's own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Socks shouldn't have standing to nominate articles for deletion. SportingFlyer T·C 23:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Necrothesp. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per WP:BEFORE. A simple Google news search finds lots of possible sources, although I can't tell easily if they are reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.