Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahibinden.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There's no consensus to delete the article, but not enough consensus to keep it either. Nonetheless, editors are encouraged to add the sources indicated in this discussion to the article. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 01:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sahibinden.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since this is a company, the appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. None of the reference meet NCORPs criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and Turkey. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep I found 2014 this piece by Haber7 (which I'd consider reliable) criticizing the company for making some in-app changes and saying that some companies will boycott the website because of it. A similar source about criticism to the company for an ad, though I wouldn't consider Haberler to be reliable per limited consensus on a trwiki RfC. This source from two months ago by Yeni Şafak is about an association criticizing the website for unreasonably high prices, however it has quite a bit of quotes from the association president. This source from Takvim is about "public outcry" due to another ad on the website. It also claims that online selling companies artificially increase the prices. This comment is a bit of generalization of all companies, not limited to Sahibinden. The rest of the sources I found weren't close to meeting WP:ORGIND. I'm not exactly sure if this means clear notability though, as you could make a case for some of the sources to be not significant enough. ~Styyx^Talk? 15:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage in this book.--Kadı Message 17:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[1] [2], 3 books! Kadı Message 17:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites. Kadı Message 17:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 09:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.