Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 06:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Russoft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simple case of a non-notable organisation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CMT: Google Books has 532 hits though whether that is significant is for debate. RJFJR (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Tough. As RJFJR noted, book coverage suggests possible notability; Russian speakers may be able to help more. This article was not tagged with WPRUSSIA talk page template until I did so just now, so Russian-speaking Wikipedians were likely not aware of this (note to nom, User:RHaworth: please tag articles on talk before AfDing them to ensure that WikiProjects will be aware of the discussion). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you mean by WPRUSSIA? I am terribly sorry. Please provide me with a comprehensive list of all the tags which I need to consider adding before I send an article to AfD. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep This is the Russian Software Developers Association similar to the British Computer Society and Institution of Analysts and Programmers at software level and UK IT Association at the company level.It certainly passes WP:GNG and is worth keeping. We really need the UK version article as well. scope_creep talk 01:30 12 January 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.