Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RtxHack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RtxHack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page for utterly non-notable youngster who claims to be some sort of Master Hacker. This cunning supervillain managed to run himself over by creating his autobio with a db-user tag [1], then pleaded on the talk page for it not to be deleted: [2]. Speedy deletion contested by another editor who inexplicably thinks that the article credibly ~~asserts notability~~ asserts enough significance to survive A7. OnionRing (talk) 00:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 00:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 00:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 00:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Speedy deletion contested by another editor who inexplicably thinks that the article credibly asserts notability". I said no such thing; read what I said again, carefully. Significance is not the same thing as notability. Adam9007 (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable hacker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It looks like there was an unfortunate clash of timing between a Prod and an AfD [3]? Anyway, an unreferences WP:SPA probable autobiography celebrating teenage behaviour of no particular importance. Fails all biographical notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 09:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probably could have been A7'ed. I would have accepted it, and I am stricter than most. The claims of significance have to be credible, and they are not for this youngster. --MelanieN (talk) 13:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.