Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RoweBots (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RoweBots

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article of non notable company. The only sources that I find in search are primary and affliated. Totally fails WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Previous nomination closed as no consensus partly due to low participation –Ammarpad (talk) 00:11, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ammarpad (talk) 00:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Ammarpad (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unambiguous advertising for a company with no indications of notability or significance. If it weren't for the previous "No consensus" close, I would have speedied it as G11. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No notability established and very much an unambiguous advertising article. RedFlame 08:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete, fails WP:Corp. No independent, notable WP:RS citing; very trivial. Kierzek (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no indication or evidence of notability. PK T(alk) 14:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.