Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roccat Browser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Unable to consider an ATD without a proposed target, however one can be created at editorial discretion Star Mississippi 22:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roccat Browser

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This browser does not have enough WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:NPRODUCT or WP:GNG. The best I could find was 1 review from maketecheasier, the rest were just forum posts or unreliable. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Technology, and Software. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find any significant coverage. — Sean Brunnock (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per the technologytell review in the article, but unsure to where. IgelRM (talk) 23:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The app does not have too much coverage. Royal88888 (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.