Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Stone (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Non-admin Close, result is keep. GB fan (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Stone (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor with no evidence of notability WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:40, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant ^talk 16:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no single reference, no single external link. Fails notability guideline.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 16:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC) Keep as referenced now.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 12:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral was in the core cast of Mr. Belvedere, a fairly major sitcom which lasted 6 seasons and over 100 episodes. Admittedly he doesn't seem to have done much else, but my gut instinct is that reliable sources probably exist which aren't easily accessed online. Neutral because I can't vote to keep an unreferenced BLP, but I'd gladly change to keep if sources are found. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm with Starblind here. While a member of the main cast of a long-running show on a major network would normally be a slam-dunk keep, this article needs more sources before I can vote keep. I'm trying to find them now ... it'll be a hard slog, but I'm betting they're there. Blueboy 96 22:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to meet WP:ENT based on his credit list. A GNews search on "Rob Stone" + Belvedere turns up enough potential sources to write an article from (even though there's admittedly very little recent, the most useful stuff would be late 80's profiles and such). Since one of the few things in the world I wouldn't rather do than watch Mr Belvedere is to read about the show, though, I'm not inclined to do that work myself. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in agreement with User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz and his diligent WP:AFTER. What can be fixed, should be fixed... through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 21:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, "keep" !votes on an unreferenced BLP with no sources offered? Fine, I'll source the thing myself. 28bytes (talk) 03:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, now that it's sourced. 28bytes (talk) 03:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 28bytes added a couple of sources. I expanded the article and added four more sources. Cullen328 (talk) 03:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sourced and done.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.