Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise Interactive (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rise Interactive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid promotional spam article. After I cleared out all the business booster blogs, pay-for-play marketing awards and dead links (which may or may not have ever worked), this is what was left. A WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of independent in-depth coverage in WP:RSes to meet the requirements of WP:CORP or WP:GNG, just a flurry of passing mentions and a little press release churnalism. I'd be happy to be shown wrong, but it would need to be shown. David Gerard (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Gnews only turns up press releases, nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 23:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All I could find was press releases as well. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. FiddleheadLady (talk) 12:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly just trying to get hits for his business. Not notable. W Nowicki (talk) 17:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; fails NCORP and is the corporate equivalent of a vanity article BilledMammal (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG is not met here Yaxı Hökmdarz (talk) 19:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.