Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise Interactive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. King Jakob C2 13:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
- Rise Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite the impressive looking array of reference, they are either press releases or local awards of a trivial nature. DGG ( talk ) 02:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I accepted this at AFC based on the organization's local CBS coverage, coverage in CNN Money, Illinois Technology Association spotlight, and other passing mentions like this one. More recent coverage in Direct Marketing News and Technori make this corp, IMHO, notable.Rinkle gorge (talk) 16:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 15:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Some recognition in places like The Chicago Grid [1] and Chicago Ideas Week [2], plus those listed on the article itself and above, help the article meet primary criteria at Wikipedia:ORG, so Keep. 115.187.74.68 (talk) 23:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.