Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rip (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rip (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found zero sources for this which might be because of the common name. Appears to fail WP:N. SL93 (talk) 16:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, but maybe redlink it in the fairly useless set of examples within CD ripper. (WP:RED would suggest leaving it unlinked though.) --Northernhenge (talk) 16:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Poking through the Google results, I don't think they're out there. That's hardly surprising given it's just a script. Msnicki (talk) 19:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not sourced; doesn't appear especially notable. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.