Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repro India
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Repro India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment the Print Week is potentially a good source and start for a stub, but I don't know. Bearian (talk) 15:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom with again one of those organization pages with no significant coverage to pass WP:NCORP. Some sources on the pages are trivia and stock stats and others are just passing mention. If anyone can find significant coverage on the organization, please let me know to review but for now this page fails to meet WP:ORGCRIT. RangersRus (talk) 14:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.