Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RenWeb (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 18:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RenWeb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because it is written like an advertisement and has no educational value Jonnymoon96 (talk) 02:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I completed the nomination for the user, who posted it on the article's talk page. ansh 666 10:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-It may be written as an advertisement, but the notability of it is clearly established because it is used by many schools. In veritas (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at best and draft & userfy if needed as my searches found nothing noticeably better than links at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam but perhaps nothing for a solidly noticeably notable article as mentioned. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:54, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Current article is nothing more than a promotional brochure. Regardless of notability, per WP:DEL4, this article needs to be blown up. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.