Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReactJS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ReactJS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, website given is a facebook page. NetworkOP (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (interview) @ 22:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (state) @ 22:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate keep. It's as famous as Angular.js, D3.js, and many other notable js libraries accepted on wikipedia. Yug (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Website http://facebook.github.io/react/ is not a "facebook.com" page, but a github page for a facebook lead project. Yug (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate keep, author here. React is being used in production by major organizations and corporations such as Facebook, Khan Academy, Netflix, and Yahoo. It also has more followers on github than EmberJS which has its own article already. Patcito (talk) 14:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep significant javascript library worthy of an article. Artw (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 03:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a well used javascript library which needs an article. Evidence is that on StackOverflow, a well known software development Q&A site, there are over a thousand questions dealing with ReactJS. --Newtronic (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Comment: Policy-backed rationales, please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 23:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found coverage in a few places: this article in de:PHP Magazin, this already cited article in InfoWorld, and this article-type thing at the Financial Times (not sure this has editorial oversight, but it seems to be part of the FT). There's also a few trivial mentions which don't help notability all that much but can possibly be used for citations, for what it's worth: [1], [2], [3], [4]. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.