Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RankMF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RankMF

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most references and other sources found online are usual corporate business with pr/promo slant. I have not been able to find sufficiently independent coverage in reliable sources. Therefore failing GNG and ORG. This is very much a "product" article with a promo slant. Questions about COI of the editor are unanswered - they only ever edited articles about SAMCO related topics. Therefore propose to delete or redirect to SAMCO. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:NCORP; significant WP:RS coverage not found. Typical launch publicity does not amount to notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Fails notability and is a promotional article. Britishfinance (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.