Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiant (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Radiant (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT Mfixerer (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Their are no appropriate sources and my search for some to add to the article found none. UptonSincere (talk) 02:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There are two inexperienced editors here, I'd like to hear from others who have participated in other AFDs.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Couple sources, haven't evaluated reliability: https://cmscritic.com/radiant-cms-review https://web.archive.org/web/20220505204305/http://www.rubyinside.com/radiant-a-rails-cms-diamond-in-the-rough-52.html Japanese book off Gbooks: https://www.google.com/books/edition/%E5%85%A5%E9%96%80Radiant_CMS/feS9QhxUVdUC?hl=en&gbpv=0 A412 (Talk • C) 08:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I wouldn't expect that the sources that signify its significance as required by WP:NSOFT can be found, and it's likely that the available sources won't meet WP:GNG either. This was one of the first libraries based on Ruby on Rails to appear, and has many trivial mentions as such, but libraries of this kind, offering trivial functionality on top of Rails itself like Radiant did, generally didn't get much traction in the Rails world. Radiant wasn't an exception and the project eventually died without leaving legacy apart from blog coverage in the early days of Rails. PaulT2022 (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.