Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R U There?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 15:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

R U There?

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources found which are independent of the subject to indicate that it meets the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I found a reliable ed.gov article which is independent from R U There? fully detailing R U There? which meets the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia, and outlines it's relation with the Ready to Learn partnership. Transatlanick (talk) 02:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for commenting here. Although the Department of Education source you give would be considered reliable, as they part-fund R U There?, they would not be considered independent of it PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't even consider that. Found another article - a blog entry by CNN contributer Mario Armostrong. I've updated it accordingly. Will this work? Transatlanick (talk) 14:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure - it's mainly referring to an interview he did, is that right? However, even if it's acceptable (I'll look at it in more detail when I get a chance), we require multiple instances of signifant coverage at independent reliable sources PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This subject got a mention on kacv public television - I added this to the references, so hopefully that holds up. Transatlanick (talk) 22:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete I can find no evidence of notability for this video game or whatever it is. I did find confirmation that it appears on some PBS stations [1] but I could find absolutely zero written ABOUT it at Google News Archive. Most Google references are to an unrelated 2010 film of the same name [2]. --MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP is not a TV guide. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 14:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.