Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RIPS
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. nomination withdrawn (NAC) (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 04:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- RIPS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Subject appears to be not notable as per WP:GNG, only coverage are (i) paper written by the author of the tool or (ii) personal blogs ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator - discussion revealed that the paper has been accepted by multiple conferences. Bit borderline but seems it sort-of passes GNG. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also the question of COPYVIO. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Article has been rewritten. Regarding the notable here are some references [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Note that the papers are written by the author, but were accepted at three peer reviewed top thier conferences[7][8][9]--jdahse (talk) 15:13, 4 January 2015 (GMT)
- ^ http://www.php-security.org/2010/06/10/winners-of-the-month-of-php-security/index.html
- ^ http://internetdefenseprize.org/
- ^ http://www.darknet.org.uk/2014/10/rips-static-source-code-analysis-for-php-vulnerabilities/
- ^ http://holisticinfosec.org/toolsmith/pdf/july2011.pdf
- ^ http://www.toolswatch.org/2012/01/rips-php-scanner-v0-50-released/
- ^ https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Source_Code_Analysis_Tools
- ^ http://www.internetsociety.org/doc/simulation-built-php-features-precise-static-code-analysis
- ^ https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity14/technical-sessions/presentation/dahse
- ^ http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2660363
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 00:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 00:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Notability established by [1] and juried papers. ~KvnG 21:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 20:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 20:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.