Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RIØT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RIØT

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable band Czarking0 (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:BAND or WP:ENT: no major awards, no songs in national charts, not certified gold, haven't won or placed in national competitions or any other notability requisite. No SIGCOV to meet WP:NBIO either. No major part in creating a major work. Maybe WP:TOOSOON — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:47, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Searches showed nothing but self-published things like Soundcloud. Rift (talk) 21:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:BAND, this band does not meet any criteria for notability. Searches on other sources also do not return any websites talk about the popularity of this band. Halley ^{luv Filipino ❤} (Talk) 22:48, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - To be generous it is too soon. Searching is tough because of the classic metal band also called Riot (now Riot V), but a search in conjunction with member names reveals nothing but their own self-uploads and occasional gig announcements. Good luck to them as they get started but they haven't yet achieved the significant coverage that is necessary for an article here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems like a pretty clear case of WP:GARAGE. If this band were more notable, it would meet the WP:BAND and WP:SIGCOV. If more sources are found to bolster notability, let me know. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WP:RS to establish notability per WP:BAND. ZachH007 (talk) 05:11, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to demonstrate the subject's notability and lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Pollia (talk) 22:37, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.