Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadient

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quadient

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to have a very long history of promotion. Sources are either lacking, don't verify the associated info, or are too close to the company Shredlordsupreme (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies. Shredlordsupreme (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

The Guardian article focuses on Daniel Raab and Daniel Graetz (sp?), 2 members of the IDF "Ghost Unit" squad composed mostly of dual nationals. For an investigation at its start, the article seems very well worded and documwnted and certainly seems to be a basis for further DOJ investigation into determining an indictment with expectation of probable conviction. Tucker Carlson rcently had an intervview with one of the founders of Wikipedia. The discussion focused on how intel organizations and special interest organizations aim to frame the content of what appears on Wikpedia. This is a serious, at least, potential problem that strikes at the very purpose of the existence of Wikipedia.

Some very ideological organizations, especially relevant in light of recent discussions about the relationship between Israeli intel and Charlie Kirk , demand exclusion of content anywhere, perceived as critical of Israeli leadership and the IDF. Megyn Kelly and Carlson have publicized the pressure brought against them for their objective analysis of several issues related to Israeli propaganda and conduct of warfare. This Wikipedia article on Raab is very relevant and important. The War in Gaza has also been a war on the International Humanitarian Law (ratified by both the USA and Israel in 1948 and thereby a part of their applicable law). The Law sets forth a mandate that military tsrgetting be characterized by proportionality in connected civilian casualties, and that civilianscannot be at all targeted in the absence of a military value. This is an important discussion since the evolution in the law of war since 1948 is threatened.

I urge Wikipedia to resist the blandishments of partisans pushing an agenda to silence the allegations and evidence against Daniel Raab and his unit partner. The issue of invisible security perimeters and killing anyone crossing them even at a long distance is very relevant to future warfare and precedent is needed to counteract impunity. Assessment of this issue needs

information which the current Wikipedia article, well-worded as it is,provides. Eclectus owner (talk) 08:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant soapbox removed. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the comment entirely instead of collapsing it? Now my comment below seems out of place. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 14:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also it isn't exactly hospitable of you to tell a new user to "sod off". ―Howard • 🌽³³ 15:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. “Sod off” is not very nice. Saying stuff like that is a good way to get sanctioned. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 18:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsing instead. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is any of this relevant to the deletion discussion? ―Howard • 🌽³³ 13:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:NOTPROMO. UnregisteredBiohazard ^{talk to me} 18:38, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: sources are mostly press releases, routine announcements and primary sources. Notability not established. MattBCN (talk) 20:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.