Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyrolisk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Looks like this one fails a wide variety of things - RS, N, FICTION, etc. If there is something in the article that someone wants to merge, ping me and I'll copy it over to your userspace. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pyrolisk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. There is no particular reason to retain such a minor fictional element. TTN (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The D&D version of Cockatrices was already deleted at AFD. This even less prominent variant, which has no coverage in reliable, secondary sources, should be deleted as well. Rorshacma (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters per WP:PRESERVE and WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and primary-sourced fancruft that is not worthy of WP:PRESERVE. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 16:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to insufficient WP:RS to establish WP:N. Chetsford (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NFICTION. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.