Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulsetrain
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 10:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pulsetrain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional page for a non-notable private company. Sources are limited to:
- WP:PRIMARYSOURCEs and/or affiliated sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].
- WP:TRADES publication coverage that is generally not considered independent: [10], [11] (appears to be based on a press release from the company), [12].
- WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs: [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].
- Sources that do not mention the company at all: [19], [20], [21] (this one is talking about a different concept of a "
pulse train
"), [22].
I didn't find any qualifying WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS that would meet WP:NCORP, searching for both "Pulsetrain" and "Bavertis," either in the article or in my WP:BEFORE search. It's worth noting this subject does not appear on de-wiki, which suggests this may be an attempt at WP:ADMASQ on en-wiki. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Germany. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.