Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proprioceptive language learning method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 09:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proprioceptive language learning method

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't look like a real language-learning method. I have never heard of it outside Wikipedia, and I can only find mirror sites and self-published books that mention it. Of the references in the article, only one makes the claim that the proprioceptive language-learning method is actually a language-learning method, and that is a self-published book by Lundquist. You can find the text of it here - note that much space is spent promoting Lundquist's English lessons. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 00:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as probable WP:OR. Most of the cited sources relate to speech pathology or to language learning generally, not to this method. Lundquist, Learning Spoken English, appears to be an exception. I wonder whether the undated "public domain" work is un-reviewed, possibly student work. Not that such work is necessarily suspect, but it should be supported by additional, reliable sources. Cnilep (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any evidence that this topic, under any of its names, meets our notability criteria. --Lambiam 16:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.