Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PreliZ
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PreliZ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of WP:GNG from the sources given: the only independent source (not co-written by PreliZ authors) is this arXiv preprint, which doesn't even mention PreliZ explicitly but only cites the original paper once for a wider claim. A quick WP:BEFORE didn't show anything else, and, as the package is still very new, it isn't surprising that significant coverage hasn't accumulated yet. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. While it might become notable, there's nothing worth salvaging from the article so far that can't be covered on Wikidata. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.