Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PitchBook Data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PitchBook Data

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:ORG. All of the sources offered are either interviews with staff, press release type stories, or announcements of the activities of the company. No sources with significant coverage. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Computing, and Washington. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ORG. In searching for additional sources, I did find a few noteworthy articles (surrounded by a sea of blog posts from the company itself) but all of these count as trivial in the WP:ORG guidelines. Especially frequent are passing mentions, which includes "quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources." DJ Cane (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.