Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoronix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Phoronix Test Suite. Randykitty (talk) 13:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phoronix

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this meets Wikipedia's guidelines for web site notability. The article is pretty much completely based on Phoronix itself as a source and can't find a way to fix it. The site, particularly the benchmarks, have been cited by mainstream media but I don't find anything substantial written about the site itself. I tried this Google search to find stuff about Phoronix that is not in Phoronix itself and that is not about the test suite (which has a separate article). I didn't see anything that would be of interest what it comes to writing a Wikipedia article. There is also not much of organization behind the site and it seems to be more or less an one-man show. ilmaisin (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ilmaisin (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ilmaisin (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ilmaisin (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Phoronix Test Suite. The Phoronix blog publishes a mix of Linux-related news and benchmark results obtained from the Phoronix Test Suite, so there's considerable overlap between the two articles. — Newslinger talk 22:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Phoronix Test Suite. Ypatch (talk) 18:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.