Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phi Beta Epsilon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 01:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Phi Beta Epsilon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 00:46, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 00:49, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable student club at 1 campus. Fails WP:N and WP:GNG. GrapedApe (talk) 00:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- but it is a greek organization founded more than 100 years ago. There has to be sources somewhere --Guerillero | My Talk 13:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are three listed in the article, but none are really independent. -- Selket Talk 17:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If there "has to be sources somewhere", please add them to the article and prove it.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are three listed in the article, but none are really independent. -- Selket Talk 17:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 13:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.